

Alternatively, you may choose to decouple your meetings solution from UC and leverage multiple vendors. This adds complexity, but it could align to your long-term UC objective. For example, file sharing in Microsoft Teams leverages SharePoint and OneDrive for Business, so you will need to consider these even if you don’t intend to fully leverage the functionality. You can de-noise Microsoft Teams to some extent, but not fully – when you deploy Microsoft Teams you will need to consider features and capabilities outside of meetings. Cisco and Zoom also offer collaboration and UC capabilities, but a key difference is that they have a meeting-only client so you can separate your decision making. It’s pitched as a team-based collaboration workspace and includes Unified Communications (UC) capability. It’s important to note that Microsoft Teams is much more than meetings. The user interfaces were easy to navigate, and in most cases, felt modern with good design and size of control elements – any of these products would address most customer online meeting requirements. Of the products reviewed, I found there to be very little difference in the feature sets they offered.

Also, my day job is consulting in the Microsoft collaboration space.
#Microsoft lync for mac join meeting update#
Feel free to reach out if you feel an update is required. We picked the top 5 software as a service (SaaS) solutions based on the Gartner Magic Quadrant below:įirstly, it’s important to note that findings are valid as at Dec 2019 and likely to change (rapidly!). While I cant share the report in its entirety, I wanted to pluck out a few bits to answer the Microsoft Teams vs Zoom question because its a very common ask of customers. A few months ago I had the privilege of writing a report for one of our customers looking at the differences between the top 5 online meeting solutions – Microsoft Teams, Zoom, Webex, GoToMeeting, BlueJeans – I say a privilege because rarely do you have a chance to have a hard look at the competition.
